On truth unpersistence: At the crossroads of epistemic modality and discourse
نویسندگان
چکیده
We propose a semantic analysis of the particles afinal (European Portuguese) and alla fine (Italian) in terms of the notion of truth unpersistence, which combines both epistemic modality and constraints on discourse structure. We argue that the felicitous use of these modal particles requires that the truth of a proposition p* fail to persist through a temporal succession of epistemic states, where p* is incompatible with the proposition modified by afinal/alla fine, and that the interlocutors share knowledge of a previous epistemic attitude toward p*. We analyze two main cases, that of plan-related propositions and that of propositions without plans. We also discuss the connections between truth unpersistence and evidentiality.
منابع مشابه
A Cross-linguistic and Cross-cultural Study of Epistemic Modality Markers in Linguistics Research Articles
Epistemic modality devices are believed to be one of the prominent characteristics of research articles as the commonly used genre among the academic community members. Considering the importance of such devices in producing and comprehending scientific discourse, this study aimed to cross–culturally and cross-linguistically investigate epistemic modality markers as an important subcategory...
متن کاملA Comparative Analysis of Epistemic and Root Modality in Two selected English Books in the Field of Applied Linguistics Written by English Native and Iranian Non-native Writers
Academic discourse has always been the focus of many linguists, especially those who have been involved with English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and discourse analysis. Persuasion, as part of rhetorical structure of academic writing, is partly achieved by employing modality markers. Adopting a descriptive design, the present study was carried out to compare the use of modality markers in terms...
متن کاملOn the nature of the epistemic readings of the Italian modal verbs: the relationship between propositionality and inferential discourse relations
The present contribution deals with the epistemic readings of the Italian modal verbs dovere ('must') and potere ('may'/'can'). The two verbs show striking differences — both quantitative and qualitative — with respect to the possibility of epistemic interpretation, differences which have gone so far completely unnoticed in the — rather scarce — semantic literature on modal verbs in Italian. Ev...
متن کاملTruth, Superassertability, and Conceivability
Epistemic theories of truth identify truth with some positive epistemic status of truth-bearers. Sophisticated versions of this theory identify truth with some kind of idealization of warranted assertability. 1 The proposal is that a belief, sentence, proposition, etc. is true iff it is warrantedly assertable in ideal epistemic conditions a, b, c…, where a, b, c… signify some sort of projection...
متن کاملEpistemic Modality in Computer-mediated Discourse: the Case of Wikipedia’s Academic Core
Epistemic modality serves to indicate how confident language users are about the truth of the ideational material they convey; it is often subdivided into two types of markers, hedges and boosters. Hedges are linguistic devices like perhaps, I guess, and to a certain extent that speakers employ to reduce the degree of liability or responsibility they might face in expressing the ideational mate...
متن کامل